What “non-compliant” actually means in practice
Non-compliance is not always obvious.
Contracts can be non-compliant because they:
- undercut award or NES entitlements
- include unenforceable clauses
- contradict how the business actually operates
- misclassify employment types
- promise flexibility that doesn’t legally exist
Many of these issues don’t show up day to day.
They surface when decisions are challenged.
This is why non-compliance often feels like a surprise.
Why non-compliant contracts are so risky for growing businesses
As businesses grow, contracts start doing more work.
At under 100 employees:
- managers rely on contracts to guide decisions
- terminations set precedent
- employees compare treatment
- disputes escalate faster
When contracts are non-compliant, employers lose confidence in their own position.
That hesitation is often visible externally and increases risk.
The most common non-compliance issues we see
Non-compliance usually falls into a few predictable categories.
Common examples include:
- pay and classification clauses that don’t match awards
- termination clauses that undercut minimum notice
- “all-in” salary wording without proper set-off
- excessive or unenforceable restraints
- casual or fixed-term clauses that don’t reflect reality
These clauses often come from templates, legacy documents or well-intended DIY changes.
They don’t fail immediately.
They fail under pressure.
What happens when a dispute arises
When a dispute arises, contracts are examined closely.
Fair Work and advisers will look at:
- whether minimum standards are met
- whether clauses are enforceable
- whether the contract aligns with actual practice
If a contract is non-compliant:
- certain clauses may be ignored
- the employer’s position weakens
- leverage in negotiations drops
- settlement pressure increases
In some cases, the contract does more harm than good.
Why “we didn’t know” doesn’t help
Non-compliance is not excused by intent.
Even if:
- the contract was inherited
- the business relied on a template
- advice was informal or outdated
The employer remains responsible.
This is why non-compliant contracts are particularly dangerous for founders who assumed “someone else handled that”.
The flow-on effects most businesses miss
The impact of non-compliant contracts goes beyond one dispute.
They often lead to:
- inconsistent treatment across employees
- confusion for managers
- reluctance to act on performance
- pressure to settle rather than defend
Over time, this erodes confidence in people decisions.
That erosion is expensive.
Why non-compliant contracts reduce leverage even when you are right
Even when an employer has acted reasonably, non-compliant contracts weaken negotiating position.
This happens because:
- advisers focus on contractual gaps rather than behaviour
- employers lose confidence in enforcing terms
- discussions shift from resolution to risk containment
In conciliation, leverage matters.
A compliant, aligned contract:
- narrows arguments
- shortens disputes
- increases confidence in decision-making
A non-compliant contract does the opposite.
It gives the other side more room to argue, delay and apply pressure.
This is why contract compliance affects outcomes even when the underlying issue has nothing to do with pay or entitlements.
Can non-compliant contracts be fixed?
Yes, but timing matters.
Contracts can usually be corrected:
- prospectively, not retrospectively
- with proper communication
- in a way that aligns with awards and NES
However:
- changes cannot be forced unreasonably
- poor timing can trigger resistance
- rushed updates can create new risk
Fixing contracts is safest before disputes arise, not during them.
The danger of partial fixes
Some businesses try to “patch” non-compliance.
This often involves:
- updating one clause
- issuing side letters
- relying on policy changes
Partial fixes can create contradictions.
When documents conflict, employers lose certainty and employees gain arguments.
Consistency matters more than speed.
How non-compliant contracts affect termination decisions
Non-compliant contracts often:
- restrict notice options
- weaken termination clauses
- create uncertainty about entitlements
This makes terminations:
- slower
- more stressful
- more likely to escalate
Many termination issues start with “we thought the contract covered this”.
Often, it doesn’t.
Why growing businesses should act early
Non-compliance compounds as headcount grows.
Each new hire:
- inherits the same risks
- increases exposure
- multiplies potential claims
Fixing one contract helps.
Fixing the system helps far more.
This is why proactive review matters.
Where HR support adds the most value
HR support is most effective when it:
- identifies non-compliance early
- prioritises risk areas
- aligns contracts with actual practice
- coordinates compliant updates
This avoids over-lawyering while restoring confidence.
The goal is not perfection.
It’s usable protection.
FAQs
Before a problem forces the issue
Non-compliant contracts rarely cause problems on their own.
They cause problems when decisions are challenged.
If you’re unsure whether your contracts still align with awards, the NES or how your business actually operates, that uncertainty is usually the cue to review them before a dispute forces your hand.
👉 Get free initial HR advice
Get Social