how should employment contracts be updated

Employment contracts should be updated when roles, risk, or business structure change, not on a fixed annual schedule.

Most businesses only think about updating contracts when something breaks. A dispute. A termination. A Fair Work issue that suddenly turns a dusty document into a live risk. For growing businesses, the better question isn’t “Do we need new contracts?” It’s “Do our contracts still reflect how the business actually operates?”

Why contracts usually fall out of date

Contracts don’t become risky because they’re old.
They become risky because the business has changed.

Common changes include:

  • roles expanding beyond their original scope
  • informal promotions or restructures
  • new managers making people decisions
  • growth in headcount and complexity

When contracts stay static but the business evolves, misalignment forms quietly.

That misalignment only shows up when decisions are challenged.

The biggest myth about updating contracts

Many business owners believe contracts should be:

  • reviewed every year, or
  • left alone unless legally required

Both approaches miss the point.

Contracts are not compliance checklists.
They are decision-support tools.

Updating contracts too often creates noise.
Leaving them untouched creates risk.

The right trigger is change, not time.

Clear signs your contracts should be reviewed

Most businesses don’t need an audit to know something’s off.

Common warning signs include:

  • roles that no longer resemble what’s written
  • managers unsure what flexibility they have
  • hesitation around termination or notice
  • reliance on “that’s how we’ve always done it”
  • contracts written for a much smaller business

If decisions feel harder than they should, contracts are often part of the problem.

When updating contracts is highest risk

Timing matters.

Contract updates can become risky when they occur:

  • immediately before or after a dispute
  • during performance management
  • after a Fair Work threat
  • without clear explanation

Poorly timed updates can look reactive or self-serving, even when intentions are reasonable.

This is why contract changes should be proactive, not defensive.

How contracts should be updated in practice

Updating contracts is rarely about rewriting everything.

In practice, effective updates usually involve:

  • aligning role descriptions with reality
  • tightening termination and notice clauses
  • correcting award or NES misalignment
  • improving flexibility and variation wording
  • strengthening confidentiality and IP protection

The goal is clarity, not complexity.

Well-updated contracts reduce friction rather than create it.

Do employees need to agree to contract changes?

Yes, in most cases.

Contract updates generally require:

  • consultation
  • agreement
  • clear communication

However, agreement does not require negotiation chaos.

Problems arise when:

  • changes are rushed
  • reasons aren’t explained
  • updates feel one-sided

Handled properly, most updates are accepted without issue.

How the proposed restraint changes affect timing

Proposed reforms announced in the 2025–26 Federal Budget are expected to significantly limit non-compete clauses from 2027.

For many businesses, this raises a practical question:
Should we wait until the law changes?

In most cases, the answer is no.

Even under current law:

  • restraint clauses are already difficult to enforce
  • overly broad restraints often fail
  • reliance on non-competes creates false confidence

The smarter approach is to:

  • review contracts now
  • reduce reliance on fragile restraints
  • strengthen confidentiality, IP and non-solicitation clauses

That way, contracts remain effective regardless of legislative change.

Why “we’ll deal with it later” usually backfires

Delaying contract updates often leads to:

  • repeated uncertainty
  • inconsistent decisions
  • increased settlement pressure
  • reactive legal advice

By the time a dispute arises, options are narrower and more expensive.

Updating contracts early preserves choice.

How contract updates reduce risk across the business

Aligned contracts:

  • support consistent management decisions
  • reduce argument during disputes
  • give managers confidence
  • shorten resolution timelines

They don’t eliminate risk.
They contain it.

For growing businesses, that containment is critical.

Where HR support adds the most value

HR support is most effective when it:

  • identifies when updates are actually needed
  • prioritises high-risk clauses
  • coordinates compliant changes
  • supports communication with employees

This avoids unnecessary rewrites while fixing real exposure.

The goal is not perfect contracts.
It’s usable, current protection.

FAQs

Not necessarily. Review when roles or risk change.

Yes. Many updates relate to structure, not remuneration.

Yes. Timing matters and advice is recommended.

Often no. Updates can be staged by role or risk.

Yes, but contracts should remain effective under current law.

Before contracts become a problem

If your business has grown but your contracts haven’t changed, misalignment is likely already there.

Contract updates are safest and simplest when they’re done calmly, early, and with the future in mind.

👉 Get free initial HR advice